Monday, August 13, 2018

RACHED GHANNOUCHI APPUIE LA PROPAGANDE POUR L'AYATOLLAH KHAMENEY



RACHED GHANNOUCHI reçoit la plus grande considération dans le site web officiel iranien  de l’AYATOLLAH KHAMENEY.   

 


Seule une idéologie radicale partagée peut inspirer une telle propagande.


Les liens entre le chef du parti islamiste Ennahdha (successeur du  Mouvement de la Tendance Islamique) en Tunisie et la doctrine politico-religieuse de l’ayatollah Khomeyni sont encore effectifs. Chose à remarquer, du moment que Rached Kheridji alias Ghannouchi reçoit la plus grande considération dans le site officiel iranien du guide suprême Khameney, comme résulte en effet d’un  article de propagande qui met en exergue ses explications  sur le gouvernement du  “Faqî”, « Clerc » (ou « gouvernement islamique »), à partir de la doctrine idéologique du tyran implacable que fut Khomeyni suite à la révolution iranienne de 1979. Il en ressort que Rached Ghannouchi est loin d’être un islamiste « modéré », selon la propagande du lobby islamiste des Frères musulmans déguisés, mais il partage au fond les mêmes convictions théocratiques et fanatiques de son idéologue dictateur et Guide sanguinaire contre les attentes révolutionnaires du peuple iranien à son temps (1).  Il faut alors demander quel pourrait être aussi le tragique destin du peuple tunisien menacé par les habiles manœuvres démagogiques d'un tel imposteur islamiste, en proximité des importantes élections de 2019. 
 
Edition, traduction et notes par Nino G. Mucci ã - Ici de suite des images “gelées” de la page du site web officiel de Khameney et des extraits de l’article publié sous le nom de Rana Rashid Mudhaffer, détentrice d’un “ Master en pensée politique islamique enseigné à l’Université Baqir al-Olum.  Elle est une experte en jurisprudence islamique et de la pensée politique chiite”, dit le site.
 
 


EXTRAITS (Traduction de l’anglais): « Les faits sur la sélection du Guide Suprême que les médias main-stream ne veulent pas que vous sachiez » (sic !)


[…] Selon ces références, la participation active du people dans le Gouvernement Islamique est essentielle et importante. Le Gouvernement islamique n’est pas éligible sans l’autorité du peuple. Rached al-Ghannouchi (né en 1941) dans La participation dans le gouvernement non-islamique dans l’ Islam libérale définit le Gouvernement Islamique comme suit:


« Le Gouvernement islamique est celui où : 1- la suprême autorité législative est pour la  shari’a, qui est la loi révélée de l’Islam, laquelle transcende toutes les lois. Dans ce contexte, ses docteurs ont la responsabilité de déduire les lois détaillées et les règles qui doivent être utilisée comme lignes-guides par les juges. Le chef de l’Etat islamique est  le chef du corps exécutif chargé de la responsabilité d’implémenter telles lois et règles. 

2- le pouvoir politique appartient à la communauté de croyants (oummah), qui doit adopter la ‘choura’ qu’est le système de consultation par mandat » (2). Comme dit Ghannouchi,  la participation dans les affaires politiques du Gouvernement islamique est un devoir pour tous les musulmans. 

 

 



« L’isolement et la séparation du politique est contraire aux lois de la Shari’a  islamique. Vali-e Faghih doit se consulter avec les autres, et tout le people est tenu à participer aux décisions et affaires du gouvernement. C’est seulement par le biais de la choura qu’on élimine la dictature. »  Ndr : C’est vrai?.. où le résultat ? Khameney? ]  Dans le système politique de l’Iran, la Choura est réalisée par le biais de l’Assemblée Consultative islamique (Majlis), le Conseil de Garde,  et l’Assemblée des experts. Chaque 4 ans, le people iranien élit le Président de l’Iran. En addiction, les élections de l’Assemblée Consultative islamique (Majlis) et aussi pour l’Assemblée des experts se tient chaque 4 ans.  A travers ces élections, le people peut élire ses candidats favoris [Ndr : dans un choix prédisposé]. La plus haute place politique en Iran, le Vali-e Faghih, est appointée par élection dans l’Assemblée des experts pour le leadership. [Ndr : et le peuple regarde…]  Un groupe de juristes, élu par la nation [Ndr : terme vague…] , choisit le Vali-e Faghih. [Ndr : et le peuple subit…]   Ce groupe de juristes sont ce qu’on appelle l’Assemblée des experts. Après la sélection du Guide Suprême, ce groupe de juristes continue à examiner comment le  leader utilise son pouvoir et  autorité. Comme résulte [sic!] nous pouvons dire que le Guide Suprême est toujours contrôlé par le people [Ndr : ou bien le contraire] ; et donc il ne peut pas suivre son intérêt ou faire des abus [Ndr : mais le groupe de juristes peuvent éventuellement l’aider à les faire].  (…) L’Assemblée des experts se réunit chaque 6 mois pour évaluer l’exercice du Guide Suprême et décider si élargir ses termes de leadership [Ndr : en pratique, toujours…].  Ayatollah Khomeyni, fondateur de la république islamique d’Iran, définit la relation entre le Guide Suprême et la nation comme suit: ​ ​ ​


Je ne veux pas imposer (ma volonté) au peuple, l’islam ne permet pas d’établir une dictature. Nous suivons les vœux du  people et agissons selon ses vues. Nous n’avons pas des droits, c’est Allah qui nous a donné un tel droit, et le prophète (P.S.)  ne nous a jamais permit d’imposer nos idées aux  musulmans."  […]

Et cela est sans doute le plus grand mensonges et le plus grand abus en absolu que nous avons jamais entendu des lèvres du tyran hypocrite et sanguinaire que fut Khomeyni (*), qui a directement causé la présente situation dramatique dans laquelle le peuple iranien en colère et en révolte crie les slogans “Mort à Khameney”, “Mort à la dictature ”!







Vidéo-ANALYSE : "Pourquoi la révolution iranienne (1979) s'est réinventée tunisienne (2011) ?"

L'imposture idéologique d'une "révolution iranienne" en 1979 et ses reflets sur la "révolution du jasmin" de 2011 en Tunisie, faux "printemps arabe" et prélude à l'hiver de la terreur djihadiste, qui hélas perdure.


La vraie Révolution du Peuple Iranien (2018-2019)




* Notoirement Khomeyni permit et commit  lui-même la pratique de la pédophilie, à travers une fatwa reportée encore de nos jours dans le site officiel du guide Khameney, selon des faits bien exposés, entre autres  par l'acerbe critique de l'islamisme et de l'intolérance religieuse, le palestinien Dr. Semi Al Deeb.
 

NOTES

 


1. Henri Sorg (intellectuel iranien sous pseudo): "L'institution d'un État islamique en Iran s'est fondée, à partir de 1981, sur un « régime de terreur » qui a duré aussi longtemps que la guerre contre l'Irak, et s'est traduit concrètement par une élimination physique des opposants politiques potentiels, le recours à la torture et une grande publicité de ces deux pratiques afin de « tenir » la population" (Voir  notamment Ervand Abrahamian, Tortured Confessions. Prisons and Public Recantations in Modern Iran, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1999 ; Amnesty International (AI), « Iran : Violations of Human Rights 1987-1990  », décembre 1990 ; AI, « Iran : Political Executions », décembre 1988 ; anonyme, « Man shahede ghatle ame zendanyane siyasi boodam » («J'ai été témoin du massacre des prisonniers politiques»), Cheshmandaz, no 14, hiver 1995 ; Hossein-Ali Montazeri, Khaterat (Mémoires).

2. Al-Ghannouchi, R. (1998). “Participation in Non-Islamic Government”. In Ch. Kurzman (Ed.), Liberal Islam (pp. 89-95). New York: Oxford University Press.


RACHED GHANNOUCHI "HONOURED" BY AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI’S OFFICIAL WEBSITE




RACHED GHANNOUCHI HAS A HIGH PLACE IN AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI’S OFFICIAL WEBSITE

 

The link between the Islamist leader of Ennahdha party in Tunisia and Khomeini’s theories is still operative, as Ghannouchi receives the highest consideration in the official Iranian website of Supreme guide Khamenei, as it results from a propaganda article which praises his  explanations  about the “Faqi”’s government (Islamic government), from  the  teachings of the bloody tyrant that Khomeini was. Such links shows us clearly that Rachid Ghannouchi, beyond his mask ("taqqyah") of "moderate" cleric, is quite a radical and unreformable Islamist leader with the same theocratic and fanatical views as the Iranian supreme Guide shares with him.


Edition and notes by Nino G. Mucci (C) - Here following some excerpts and frozen images from the webpage containing the article signed  by  Rana Rashid Mudhaffer, who “holds an MA degree in Islamic Political Thought from the University of Baqir al-Olum University.  She is an expert on Islamic Jursprudence and Shia Political Thought”, says the webpage. The content is visible on the site (web-page consulted :August 13, 2018).


[…] According to these references, the active participation of the people in the Islamic government is essential and important. The Islamic government is not eligible, if it ignores the authority of the people. Rashid al-Ghannouchi (b. 1941) in Participation in Non-Islamic Government in Liberal Islam defines the Islamic government as follows:

The Islamic government is one in which: 1- supreme legislative authority is for the shari’a, which is the revealed law of Islam, which transcends all laws. Within this context, it is responsibility of scholars to deduce detailed laws and regulations to be used as guidelines by judges. The head of the Islamic state is the leader of the executive body entrusted with the responsibility of implementing such laws and regulations.

2- political power belongs to the community (ummah), which should adopt a form of ‘shura’ which is a system of mandatory consultation 1.  Just as Ghannouchi mentions, participation in political affairs of the Islamic government is a duty for all Muslims.


 




Isolation and separation from politics is contrary to Islamic Sharia laws. Vali-e Faghih must consult with others, and all the people are bound to participate in the government decisions and affairs. It is only through Shura that dictatorship can be removed from a country. […]  In the political system of Iran, Shura is realized by means of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis), the Guardian Council and the Assembly of Experts. Every four years, the Iranian people elect the President of Iran. In addition, the elections for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis) and also for the Assembly of Experts take place every four years.  Through these elections, people can select their favourite candidates.

The highest political position in Iran, i.e. Vali-e Faghih, is appointed by means of election in the Assembly of Experts for Leadership. [1]  A group of jurists, elected by the nation, choose Vali-e Faghih. This group of jurists are referred to as the Assembly of Experts. After selection of the Supreme Leader, this group of jurists continue to examine how the leader uses his power and authority. As a result, we can say that the Supreme Leader is always controlled by the people [Redaction: but rather viceversa ...]; and, thus, cannot follow his own interests or misuse his authority [Redaction: unless the Assembly of Experts does help him on doing so...]. 

In fact, the Assembly of Experts consists of a council of elected religious scholars, who have the responsibility of selecting the Supreme Leader and supervising his activities. The Assembly of Experts meet every 6 months to evaluate the Supreme Leader's practice and decide whether to extend his term of leadership [Redaction: but in practise this happens always...]. Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, defines the relation between the Supreme Leader and the nation as follows: ​ ​ ​ ​

I do not want to impose (my will) on my people, and Islam does not permit us to establish a dictatorship. We follow our nation’s votes and act according to their views. We have no right, God has not conferred such a right to us, and the Prophet (pbuh) never permitted us to impose our ideas upon Muslims."  […]

And this is certainly one of the biggest lies we have certainly heard from the hypocrite and bloody tyrant Khomeini [2] who directly caused the present tragic situation, by which the Iranian people in anger and revolt cry “Death to Khameney”, “Death to dictatorship”!

 





[1] Al-Ghannouchi, R. (1998). “Participation in Non-Islamic Government”. In Ch. Kurzman (Ed.), Liberal Islam (pp. 89-95). New York: Oxford University Press.



 

[2] “The Assembly of Experts is a clerical council responsible for electing the Supreme Leader of Iran". Members of the Assembly are theoretically elected by the people.

 

[3] Notoriously, Khomeini adopted and approved paedophilia by fatwa .  







 


Sunday, August 13, 2017

Against the submission to Islamic veil in Iran by Federica Mogherini EU High Representative

Against the submission to Islamic veil in Iran by Federica Mogherini EU High Representative



Open Letter  - to Ms. Federica Mogherini, European Union High Representative






Letter of protest to her submission to the imposed Islamic veil in Iran, as free woman, as democratic representative and as High Representative of the European Union and of the principles of equality that this Union should embody, represent and protect to the face of foreign countries and in the world relationships of the European Community.




Excellence,


as many readers and viewers, but with a delay due to summer distractions, I have had the unpleasant surprise to see you, in the images diffused by international media during Your meetings in Teheran with the representatives of the Islamic Republic of Iran, under an Islamic veil that painfully echoes to me the torment of millions of Iranian women to which the chador has been imposed after the deception of a revolution that evidently - and as You well know - was also an international plot in 1979 to uproot a monarch, a glorious Shah, who wanted to bring his country to levels of economic progress and liberty in the rights of conscience formerly unknown in the Moslem world; and that inevitably arouse economic envies and sabotages against his country’s security also from western "allied" countries already creeping around. So this history goes on and you also, since few years ago, like to “cover it with a veil” (but perhaps not so dramatically before today); this last occasion confirms therefore what, according to you, has to become a new custom necessary to Europe: maybe to submit herself to Islam?



I don't write this letter to you uniquely as voluntary and free-lance Human Rights activist in a Tunisia more and more torn internally, more poor and insecure for her future and for her frontiers threatened by the terrorism of that jihadists departed by her same territory to attack other Arab countries, nations as Libya, Egypt and Syria that have much suffered in human terms, in economic and civilization matters; as the terrorists were behind "revolutionary" chimeras that have much to do with Khomeini’s ideological legacy to Iran ;



I write to you for a personal human wish, after different mails I already sent to you through the EEAS (European External Action Service) that however never received an answer, but also and moreover after my precedent Open letter published on this blog, that has been successful on public reading, to say finally to you by the present how I’m literally shocked by Your repeated political gesture in Teheran.



And besides, absolutely convinced that the official explanations given by EU Foreign Service are not satisfactory, because to the protocol whims from a despotic regime one can utterly respond with refusal, or with the delegation of a subordinate diplomat, to replace certain haughty theocratic characters to their human dimension of arrogance. And it is only so that some regimes can be complied to let the principle of human equality among the peoples finally triumph. Such kind of reflection I won't miss to propose to a personality that I deeply admire for his human appointment and his philosophical abilities, and I speak of a person of great world responsibility, seen the proximities and the strategic views, Mr. Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation.



Because I think that this has not been a personal choice of Yours, not a gesture of religious respect as when you personally visit a synagogue, for instance, but it’s a very symbolic signal of obedience to protocol "norms” that offend the same diplomatic practice, in so much capriciously and uniquely demanded only in Khomeinist Iran, and, as long as You’ll appreciate my sincerity, this gesture of Yours constitutes a bow to autocratic, xenophobe and antifeminist norms that are the real mark of this regime, diametrically opposite to our civilization values of equality and dignity in the relationships between the man and the woman, as from long and undisputed European tradition.



This "reverence" to a tenebrous theocracy incapable of self-reform, to a regime that is countersigned for its cruelty and violence toward every form of protest, above all juvenile and at university, and that is at the centre of a vast literature of opposition, particularly of those Iranian women that have been the first victims of these forms of oppression, of discrimination and  persecution, up to the jail and up to the exile, all this, I’ll tell You, offends me deeply, not only as activist for the Human Rights, but also as Italian, Your fellow countryman therefore, and as European. 



These images, without any aesthetic, of a singular protocol’s imposed chador on Your head of High Representative of the European diplomacy, humiliate me as Italian, indeed because so proud of the justness of the good and honest journalist and writer that Oriana Fallaci was and is presently to the memory of millions of Italians and free citizens of the world, as long we feel at comfort with our Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that Khomeini's Iran till now despises. Because the writings of Oriana Fallaci had us almost prophetically announced today's reality of moral subjugation of Europe to the DIKTAT of an Eurabia [1], her "dhimmitude" - I believe that the term is not unknown to You - toward which a financial exploiter without any scruples as Iran really pushes us, playing the road companion of Qatar, a country that is on the vertex of the terrorist financing of the Islamic State, perhaps fictitious seen USA protectionism, and that doesn't even have shame of it. I’ll keep silent here, because I think that we understand each other and many people will understand too the matter I’m speaking of.


But, I said, remembering the example and the courage of “our" national Oriana, I felt proud of morally participating, identifying even me to the famous gesture of challenge that the then young woman journalist brought infront of the arrogance of Khomeini himself: that to get away the bulky chador, which had been her strictly appointed, at the end of her famous interview!



You have perhaps forgotten this:  yet I consider that once You were enrolled into the juvenile movement of the Italian communist party! How to forget then this great example of human liberation from "a fool medieval rag?"  



You, like many informed Europeans; avid to read touching human testimonies, are now not moved anymore by Marina Nemat’s book "Prisoner of Teheran", which gave the script for a recent cinema version? The real case of the young Christian woman, of Russian origin, that refused to follow Islamic lessons at school and was therefore imprisoned and tortured, still teen, in the infamous jail of Evin?  There -as many other women whose memory has been darkened forever– she has been raped and then forced in a perverse blackmail to marry the jailer to save her family, forced to abjure her faith, to which she will return once free from this hell of regime, the same to which you offer today Your support in the name of the European union? The slap of humiliation that we all receive from it, we Italians, we Europeans, we Westerners, we Libertarians and not libertine Islamists, is quite unbearable!



Perhaps You have not even read and morally caressed the human empathy of the famous "Reading Lolita in Teheran" of Azar Nefisi, the extraordinary Iranian writer that many times went to  Italy to present her work and her testimony that has described us so well and persuasively the bestiality and theocratic hypocrisy of an ignorant fanatic as Khomeini. Some religious Shiites have had the courage, certainly talking from freer places in the world than Iran, to report it. If however you didn’t read any of these books, of these witnesses that represent same Calvary of the human and above all female tribulation, I can morally excuse you then of an otherwise unforgivable forgetfulness during Your last meeting in Teheran.



I am not able, rather we are not able - as certainly I’m not the only one to perceive this bitter mistrust and human pain - to marvel us that "euro-scepticism" is spreading further as oil stain today, bringing a serious damage to the image and the integrity itself of the European union, a Union that should be above all of humanistic and universal ideals, not a pure alliance of financial affairs and the result of NATO expansionistic appetites, but the reflex of the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights, first great chapter after the bloody last World War,  as a sign of rebirth symbolized in its high expression in Geneva, 1948.  Expression refused from the theocratic and oppressive regime of Khomeini’s Iran, and therefore showing us a true dictatorship that must be called with its true name, really departing from this refusal of human universality of civil rights. And inevitably ending in the verification of the monstrous number of body-inflected sentences and death sentences, particularly unfair because they strike fragile people, without suitable juridical assistance, and because they are publicly inflicted with hangings that show the reality of an horrid, unhealthy and psychologically abject theocracy, and because in its vast jails, a number certainly not easily reportable of prisoners, after the promises-lies of the “imam” Khomeini to abolish its use, suffer till now horrible and inexpressible torture.



We cannot play, of course, to believe in the demagogy publicized by this regime, one that is so hateful as equally hypocrite and liar.  Hateful - I insist in the use of the adjective - because as You cannot certainly ignore – present Iran denies, with a negation that is of State, one of the greatest tragedies of the modern history, the Jewish Holocaust, as it denies with a position of human contempt that becomes the real anti-Semite characteristic of this regime, the dignity and the perennial right to existence of the Jewish State, of an Israel consecrated by History, that today Iran doesn't want to recognize.



How many assassinations, as atrocious as revolting, and how many terrorist attacks have been operated by the theocratic and oppressive regime of Iran, without remembering the vastness, the gravity and the international consequences of them, while this same regime has illustrated itself in demagogical attacks and the defamation of other states of the world, of the West, of Israel, of the same Europe that today you represent? A loose aggression against the West that today You oddly forget and from which you don’t request any excuse, any moral wage of future good behaviour; and here I need to remember particularly the grisly murder on terrorist background of the Iranian opponent Chapour Bakhtiar in Paris, where he was a political refugee and where he was betrayed despite closer protection accorded to him by France as State guarantee and nevertheless the crime happened in very embarrassing police circumstances. I sincerely have a good formation on conspiracy’s ramifications and "silent" assassinations operated in an almost perfect secret by the Islamic Republic of Iran, of which the opponents living as refugees in foreign countries fear so much the long operational tentacles at world level, United States and Europe included. But I won't write anything on this thorny subject, since not of the space of a simple letter I would need, but of the tomes of a whole specialized encyclopaedia on the theme.



Today this terrible threat on the West, hidden by Rohani’s clever smiles, the cobweb of its ideological-theocratic absolutism that is tangible despite façade’s flexibility, on the background of the false Arab springs, stretches itself on Europe with the same vast degree of Your very symbolic “reverence” to the enslavement that the chador implies, as Oriana Fallaci well understood, and whose ceremonial employment in the diplomatic frame that You have adopted couldn’t do better publicity to a regime truly hated from any human rights supporter, just for its own antifeminist and discriminatory hatefulness.



We will wait for the promised reforms, that I believe however lies  as the dissimulation’s schemes of which Khomeini was absolute teacher, with many faithful and sadist pupils until today, but in the meantime I really wish that a great number of Iranian women, not certainly following Your example but in open rebellion to Teheran’s regime, freed themselves of the gloomy chador that suffocates them and hides us their particular oriental beauty, the beauty that shined around at Shah’s epic times, peace to his soul.



As good Farewell demands, I sincerely wish to You a consequent European diplomatic overhaul in the uneasy Middle-East puzzlements.

Best Regards,


Nino Gaetano Mucci





NOTES

[1]  See Bat Yeor's consistent review of the geopolitical concept of "Eurabia"







Wearing (again) the Islamic veil at last official Teheran’s meetings, European Union High Representative Federica Mogherini shows particularly to forget the tragedy of women rights in Iran, that are discriminated and often imprisoned for ideological motives, when they are not sent to death row with consequent public hangings; in such sense the Chief of European diplomacy in front of such Islamist deceitful regime, still subdued to Khomeini’s hateful preaches and views, abdicates to her duty to sustain the inalienable rights of the women, of the equality among the sexes, of the liberty of faith, of conscience and of opinion that are the crowning of our Universal Declaration of Human Rights after the end of the last World War (1948), as long this Declaration of universal rights is not recognized by the Islamic Republic of Iran, responsible of crimes against humanity, applying rudely the Shar’îa or Islamic Law, for instance allowing the marriage with female children of only 9 years, practising dishonourable and inhuman body-inflected punishments, and in spite of this, with the arrogance to demagogically sell off itself for a "democratic regime", demagogic deceit that Ms. Mogherini publicises acting irresponsibly against the prestige of the European union and damaging consequently the democratic and libertarian image of the same Union